Bones of Caiaphas
The bones of the ancient Jewish High Priest Caiaphas Caiaphas have been found. He is one of the most despised New Testament figures – right up there with Pilate. Caiaphas was an important official in Jerusalem and is named multiple times in the New Testament. He served for eighteen years (AD 18-36) as a high priest appointed by the Roman government. As such, he had two loyalties; one to the Jewish population for whom he served as their high priest, but also to the Roman government who appointed him.
Caiaphas and Annas
Annas was the father-in-law of Caiaphas (John 18:13) and was also called a “high priest.” Similarly, Luke states that John the Baptist also served “in the priesthood of Annas and Caiphas.” (Luke 3:2). Their interrelationship is difficult to understand but there is a resolution.
Annas had been the high priest before Caiaphas from AD 7-15 until he was removed by that position by the Roman ruler Valerius Gratus (Josephus, Antiquities, 18.2.2). Harrison notes,
It iss likely that the Jewish people still regarded Annas as the legitimate holder of the office, which according to the Law [of Moses] was for life.”
Others have contended that it is possible that in New Testament times, the office of High Priest had been corrupted and was a term used to refer to everyone in the Jewish ruling class.
Enemy of Christ
Caiaphas was an enemy of Christ. He began to fully sense the potential impact of Christ after the resurrection of Lazarus and a council was convened. The fear was expressed that if they just ignored Christ, the city populace might rally around the miracle maker which might bring the Romans down on the population. It was Caiaphas who posed the question as to whether it was better for one man to perish [Christ] rather than the whole nation be killed.
The means for carrying this scheme forth was discussed in Caiaphas’ house (Matthew 26:3) and when Christ was later arrested, he was brought to Caiaphas’ house (Matthew 26:57). Caiaphas vigorously interrogated Christ charging him with blasphemy – a capital offense under Jewish law.
The Jewish leaders could not carry out the sentence of death while being ruled by the Romans and so had to get Pilate – the Roman ruler over Jerusalem at the time – to condemn him. This was later accomplished and Christ was ignominiously crucified.
The Caiaphas Ossuary with the Bones of Caiaphas
It was the custom of first-century Jews to bury their dead in an ossuary. The body is first buried in a temporary burial place. Then after at least a year the remains are moved and placed in an ossuary. This greatly reduced the space taken up by dead bodies in crowded Jerusalem and elsewhere. Over time, more than one person’s remains could be stored in a single tomb.
The custom of ossuary burial did not persist after the first century among Jewish populations.
Just south of Jerusalem in 1990, a limestone ossuary was discovered. When it was examined, one contained the remnants of several persons including a man about sixty years of age. This particular ossuary was elaborately decorated suggesting it belonged to an important person. On the exterior were the words, ” Joseph, son of Caiaphas.” Caiaphas was apparently a family name, and according to Josephus, the high priest who succeeded Annas was “Joseph Caiaphas.” (Antiquities, 18.2.2; 18:.4.3).
Ronny Reich of the Israel Antiquities Authority, suggests these are “in all probability” the bones of the same high priest who set in motion the events leading to the death of Christ.
Ossuaries
Example of the Garden Tomb
A burial space was sparse in ancient Jerusalem; it was the tradition during the centuries around the time of Christ’s life for a dead body to be placed on a rob slab within a cave or burial space. A rock would be placed in front of the space in order to prevent wild animals and grave robbers from gaining access to the body.
Alternatively, poorer people were placed within a shroud and buried in the ground. Usually only the rich could afford a space within a cave in order to have their initial burial.
After about a year passed and the body decayed, the family would return and gather up the bones and any possessions buried with the dead person. They would then be placed within a limestone ossuary and stored by the family. Often richer families would have the ossuary engraved with information regarding the bones housed within.
Summary
Modern archaeology has been very productive in the identification of artifacts belonging to multiple important Biblical people; certainly, Caiaphas fits into that group. Other individuals whose artifacts have been found include Pilate, Isaiah, Jezebel, and King David.
It is difficult to exaggerate how important these artifacts are toward establishing the historicity of Scripture. Until recently, the existence of these individuals has been questioned by liberal religious scholars who generally believe much of the history contained within Scripture is a myth.
Now, most liberal scholars are being forced by archaeologic findings to acknowledge the historicity of these Biblical characters. Even the historicity of Christ is now acknowledged by most liberal, secular, religious scholars although they deny the divinity and the Resurrection.
It is anticipated that more artifacts supporting Scripture will come to light every year.
References
Harrison, Everett F. 1975. Acts: The Expanding Church. Chicago, IL: Moody.
related posts
Why Christ was Crucified
Precisely why Christ was crucified is a question posed by curious Christians throughout the centuries. There is no real doubt the crucifixion occurred – it is one of the best-documented events in ancient history. The Scriptures, as well as extra-Biblical history, support the historicity of Christ’s crucifixion. Ancient Greco-Roman sources… Read More »
Sign of Jonah
The Sign of Jonah Christians are very familiar with the story of Jonah in the Old Testament. The Reader’s Digest version is that Jonah was a Jewish prophet who was called to go to the capital city of the Assyrian empire – Nineveh. The Assyrians were particularly troublesome of the… Read More »
Historicity of the Resurrection
The historicity of the resurrection has been debated for many years. The “minimal facts argument was developed by Gary Habermas for his Ph.D. dissertation to evaluate the possibility that the resurrection was an actual historical event and not just a nice story invented by an ancient culture. While secular scholars… Read More »
Objections to the Resurrection
Some modern theologians have objections to the resurrection. However, most historians – even the atheist and agnostic ones – agree on the historicity of the events surrounding the resurrection of Christ. The minimal facts approach proposes at least five facts which are generally agreed by everybody; Christ Died by Crucifixion… Read More »